Why does a Z suffix RFC 3339 timestamps result in a time zone annotation of Etc/Unknown?
#9
-
|
I'm finding that I'm aware that time zones and time representations are fraught, but I was wondering why Buff behaves this way? That said, it's an invaluable tool! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
|
Your link to RFC 3339 isn't quite right. The specific section you want is RFC 3339 Section 4.3:
That is, However, RFC 9557 Section 2.2 revised this part of RFC 3339 to read as this instead:
In other words, Note that Biff supports |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Your link to RFC 3339 isn't quite right. The specific section you want is RFC 3339 Section 4.3:
That is,
Zis equivalent to+00:00in meaning that UTC is the preferred reference point. According to this section, you are correct that2025-10-15T17:48:50Zshould parse with a time zone annotation ofUTC.However, RFC 9557 Section 2.2 revised this part of RFC 3339 to read as this instead: