Skip to content

After upgrading from KCL 2.x to 3.0.2, we observed a increase in ConditionalCheckFailedException our multi-stream consumer setup. #1467

@yukyongsoo

Description

@yukyongsoo

Environment

  • KCL version: 3.0.2
  • AWS SDK version: 2.29.24
  • Lease Table: DynamoDB (on-demand)
  • Number of KCL worker instances: 4
  • Number of streams: 2 (using MultiStreamTracker and Non-fanOut)
  • Shard count per stream: 4 and 1

ERROR MESSAGE

THREAD: LeaseRenewer-000N

The conditional request failed (Service: DynamoDb, Status Code: 400, Request ID: NDBIG6THU1RKAGN8RIKG5VL8F7VV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJG)

STACK TRACE ( But It't not helpful )

software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.conditionalcheckfailedexception: The conditional request failed (Service: DynamoDb, Status Code: 400, Request ID: 7L2OU96QQC38PQ229LAHQQ9BT7VV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJG)
software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.ConditionalCheckFailedException: The conditional request failed (Service: DynamoDb, Status Code: 400, Request ID: 7L2OU96QQC38PQ229LAHQQ9BT7VV4KQNSO5AEMVJF66Q9ASUAAJG)
at software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.ConditionalCheckFailedException$BuilderImpl.build(ConditionalCheckFailedException.java:236)
at software.amazon.awssdk.services.dynamodb.model.ConditionalCheckFailedException$BuilderImpl.build(ConditionalCheckFailedException.java:169)
at software.amazon.awssdk.protocols.json.internal.unmarshall.AwsJsonProtocolErrorUnmarshaller.unmarshall(AwsJsonProtocolErrorUnmarshaller.java:95)
at software.amazon.awssdk.protocols.json.internal.unmarshall.AwsJsonProtocolErrorUnmarshaller.handle(AwsJsonProtocolErrorUnmarshaller.java:71)
at software.amazon.awssdk.protocols.json.internal.unmarshall.AwsJsonProtocolErrorUnmarshaller.handle(AwsJsonProtocolErrorUnmarshaller.java:42)
at software.amazon.awssdk.core.http.MetricCollectingHttpResponseHandler.lambda$handle$0(MetricCollectingHttpResponseHandler.java:52)
at software.amazon.awssdk.core.internal.util.MetricUtils.measureDurationUnsafe(MetricUtils.java:102)
at software.amazon.awssdk.core.internal.util.MetricUtils.measureDurationUnsafe(MetricUtils.java:95)
at software.amazon.awssdk.core.http.MetricCollectingHttpResponseHandler.handle(MetricCollectingHttpResponseHandler.java:52)
at software.amazon.awssdk.core.internal.http.async.AsyncResponseHandler.lambda$prepare$0(AsyncResponseHandler.java:92)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$UniCompose.tryFire(CompletableFuture.java:1150)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.postComplete(CompletableFuture.java:510)
at java.base/java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.complete(CompletableFuture.java:2147)
at software.amazon.awssdk.core.internal.http.async.AsyncResponseHandler$BaosSubscriber.onComplete(AsyncResponseHandler.java:135)
at software.amazon.awssdk.core.internal.metrics.BytesReadTrackingPublisher$BytesReadTracker.onComplete(BytesReadTrackingPublisher.java:74)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.ResponseHandler$DataCountingPublisher$1.onComplete(ResponseHandler.java:519)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.ResponseHandler.runAndLogError(ResponseHandler.java:254)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.ResponseHandler.access$600(ResponseHandler.java:77)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.ResponseHandler$PublisherAdapter$1.onComplete(ResponseHandler.java:375)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.nrs.HandlerPublisher.publishMessage(HandlerPublisher.java:402)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.nrs.HandlerPublisher.flushBuffer(HandlerPublisher.java:338)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.nrs.HandlerPublisher.receivedDemand(HandlerPublisher.java:291)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.nrs.HandlerPublisher.access$200(HandlerPublisher.java:61)
at software.amazon.awssdk.http.nio.netty.internal.nrs.HandlerPublisher$ChannelSubscription$1.run(HandlerPublisher.java:495)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.PromiseTask.runTask(PromiseTask.java:98)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.PromiseTask.run(PromiseTask.java:106)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.runTask(AbstractEventExecutor.java:173)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.AbstractEventExecutor.safeExecute(AbstractEventExecutor.java:166)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor.runAllTasks(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:472)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:566)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:998)
at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Thread.java:833)

comparison data ( one day occurred )

2.X -> success: 151 fail: 0
3.X -> success: 255 fail: 321

Current Configuration ( The rest is default )

maxLeasesToStealAtOneTime: 3
idleTimeBetweenReadsInMillis: 10000

Change Configuration For Tested

maxLeasesToStealAtOneTime: 1
failoverTimeMillis: 20000

but still same result...

can we reduce this error? or we ignore this ?

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions