Error in svd when response_type="transient"

[daniel-wells]

Firstly thanks for adding the transient option!

However, when response_type="transient" i.e. no genes are designated switching svd throws an error:

library(ouija)
data(example_gex)
oui <- ouija(example_gex, response_type="transient")
Error in svd(x, nu = 0, nv = k) : a dimension is zero

Presumably this is due to attempting prcomp on no genes

ouija/R/ouija.R

Line 170 in 1ebc4ea

pc1 <- prcomp(Y_switch)$x[,1]

Perhaps just do a pca of the full Y?

Also in the readme the data is called synth_gex rather than example_gex.

[kieranrcampbell]

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for catching this. The reason for this behaviour is that if all your genes were transient then PC1 wouldn't correspond to anything like "true" pseudotime, whereas PCA-ing only the switch-like genes will still approximate pseudotime. Ways to fix this I would envisage as

• Don't allow all-transient datasets
• PCA the transient genes anyway
• Set it randomly
• Initialise from a different pseudotime algorithm (DPT is the only one I've found that actually works when everything is transient)

In any case, Stan with HMC is normally efficient enough that initialising randomly gets you back to the "truth", whereas Stan with ADVI is obviously sensitive to init.

Open to suggestions,

Thanks,

Kieran

[kieranrcampbell]

Hi Daniel,

Thanks for catching this. The reason for this behaviour is that if all your genes were transient then PC1 wouldn't correspond to anything like "true" pseudotime, whereas PCA-ing only the switch-like genes will still approximate pseudotime. Ways to fix this I would envisage as

• Don't allow all-transient datasets
• PCA the transient genes anyway
• Set it randomly
• Initialise from a different pseudotime algorithm (DPT is the only one I've found that actually works when everything is transient)

In any case, Stan with HMC is normally efficient enough that initialising randomly gets you back to the "truth", whereas Stan with ADVI is obviously sensitive to init.

Open to suggestions,

Thanks,

Kieran

[daniel-wells]

Ah I see, I think random initiation seems like a good option - simple and unrestrictive.