Skip to content

Actions: microsoft/autogen

Actions

All workflows

Actions

Loading...
Loading

Showing runs from all workflows
2,500+ workflow runs
2,500+ workflow runs

Filter by Workflow

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Event

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Status

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Branch

⌥ + click/return to exclude

Filter by Actor

⌥ + click/return to exclude
Architecture question: Handshake protocol for cross-runtime agent identification Remove awaiting-op-response label if op responded #6992: Issue comment #7589 (comment) created by hanselhansel
9s
9s
feat(autogen-ext): add OPA tool-call authorization Git LFS Check #10589: Pull request #7524 synchronize by Prithvi1994
Action required Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Action required
feat(autogen-ext): add OPA tool-call authorization Docs #8364: Pull request #7524 synchronize by Prithvi1994
Action required Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Action required
feat(autogen-ext): add OPA tool-call authorization Redis Memory Tests #920: Pull request #7524 synchronize by Prithvi1994
Action required Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Action required
feat(autogen-ext): add OPA tool-call authorization CodeQL Advanced #8607: Pull request #7524 synchronize by Prithvi1994
Action required Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Action required
feat(autogen-ext): add OPA tool-call authorization Mem0 Memory Tests #1599: Pull request #7524 synchronize by Prithvi1994
Action required Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Action required
feat(autogen-ext): add OPA tool-call authorization dotnet-ci #12199: Pull request #7524 synchronize by Prithvi1994
Action required Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Action required
feat(autogen-ext): add OPA tool-call authorization Checks #8789: Pull request #7524 synchronize by Prithvi1994
Action required Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Prithvi1994:feat/opa-tool-authorization
Action required
fix: validate round robin participants early dotnet-ci #12198: Pull request #7608 opened by MukundaKatta
Action required MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
Action required
fix: validate round robin participants early Checks #8788: Pull request #7608 opened by MukundaKatta
Action required MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
Action required
fix: validate round robin participants early Git LFS Check #10588: Pull request #7608 opened by MukundaKatta
Action required MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
Action required
fix: validate round robin participants early CodeQL Advanced #8606: Pull request #7608 opened by MukundaKatta
Action required MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
Action required
fix: validate round robin participants early Redis Memory Tests #919: Pull request #7608 opened by MukundaKatta
Action required MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
Action required
fix: validate round robin participants early Docs #8363: Pull request #7608 opened by MukundaKatta
Action required MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
Action required
fix: validate round robin participants early Mem0 Memory Tests #1598: Pull request #7608 opened by MukundaKatta
Action required MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
MukundaKatta:codex/round-robin-participant-validation
Action required
fix: validate participants type in BaseGroupChat.__init__ Remove awaiting-op-response label if op responded #6991: Issue comment #7607 (comment) created by nileshpatil6
10s
10s
Remove awaiting-op-response label if op responded Remove awaiting-op-response label if op responded #6990: created by microsoft-github-policy-service Bot
8s
8s
fix: validate participants type in BaseGroupChat.__init__ Checks #8787: Pull request #7607 opened by nileshpatil6
Action required nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
Action required
fix: validate participants type in BaseGroupChat.__init__ dotnet-ci #12197: Pull request #7607 opened by nileshpatil6
Action required nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
Action required
fix: validate participants type in BaseGroupChat.__init__ Redis Memory Tests #918: Pull request #7607 opened by nileshpatil6
Action required nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
Action required
fix: validate participants type in BaseGroupChat.__init__ Docs #8362: Pull request #7607 opened by nileshpatil6
Action required nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
Action required
fix: validate participants type in BaseGroupChat.__init__ CodeQL Advanced #8605: Pull request #7607 opened by nileshpatil6
Action required nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
Action required
fix: validate participants type in BaseGroupChat.__init__ Git LFS Check #10587: Pull request #7607 opened by nileshpatil6
Action required nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
Action required
fix: validate participants type in BaseGroupChat.__init__ Mem0 Memory Tests #1597: Pull request #7607 opened by nileshpatil6
Action required nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
nileshpatil6:fix/participants-type-validation
Action required
RoundRobinGroupChat raises raw AttributeError/TypeError for invalid participants instead of a clear validation error Remove awaiting-op-response label if op responded #6989: Issue comment #7580 (comment) created by nileshpatil6
6s
6s