Replies: 1 comment
-
|
We're not limited to the Assist option. Any interested user can create an LLM API integration and define any entities, tools, prompts, and so on. I wanted to be able to use LLM in a limited way without overloading the model with unnecessary context (the built-in commands are sufficient for basic actions), so I created an integration for myself that provides access only to selected scripts. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
-
Describe the feature
We need more control over which tools are exposed to the conversation agents, particularly the ability to disable builtin Hass tools.
The number of integrations adding tools and bloating the context is growing every release.
It is well known now that the success of Agentic systems comes down to context engineering. We shouldn't be stuffing so much into the Assist agent's context if it can't be used properly.
Use cases
Anything else?
No response
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions