|
108 | 108 | \sqrt{M_{Pd}c^2 P_{diss} \tau_A} }{ \epsilon} |
109 | 109 | \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mathrm{Pd}}}{N}} . |
110 | 110 | \end{aligned} |
| 111 | +\label{eq:g_to_Pdiss} |
111 | 112 | \end{equation} |
112 | 113 | $$ |
113 | 114 |
|
|
120 | 121 | We can connect $\bar \Upsilon$ to $g$ through: |
121 | 122 |
|
122 | 123 | $$ |
123 | | -\frac{|\langle \mathrm{Pd}^* | a_z | \mathrm{Pd} \rangle| \sqrt{M_{Pd}c^2}}{\epsilon} = \sqrt{\frac{\bar \Upsilon}{4 \epsilon}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{2.2 \times 10^{-8}}{\times6.75 \times 10^6 \times 1.6\times 10^{-19}\, \rm J}} \approx 142 |
| 124 | +\frac{|\langle \mathrm{Pd}^* | a_z | \mathrm{Pd} \rangle| \sqrt{M_{Pd}c^2}}{\epsilon} = \sqrt{\frac{\bar \Upsilon}{\epsilon}} \approx \sqrt{\frac{2.2 \times 10^{-8}}{6.75 \times 10^6 \times 1.6\times 10^{-19}\, \rm J}} \approx 142 |
124 | 125 | $$ |
125 | 126 |
|
126 | 127 | This gives |
|
302 | 303 | \hbar \omega_0 \, \Delta n_{00} |
303 | 304 | &= \hbar \omega_0 |
304 | 305 | \left( 2 n_j \,\bar{\Upsilon}_j \, |e^{(O)}|^2 \, n_O \right)^{1/3} \\ |
305 | | -&= 0.12 \, |e^{(O)}|^{2/3} \, (n_j)^{1/3} |
| 306 | +&= 0.075 \, |e^{(O)}|^{2/3} \, (n_j)^{1/3} |
306 | 307 | \left( \frac{P_D^{(O)}}{1\,\mathrm{W}} \right)^{1/3} |
307 | 308 | \left( \frac{f_O}{1\,\mathrm{MHz}} \right)^{1/6} |
308 | 309 | \;\mathrm{eV} |
|
344 | 345 | ~{\rm s}^{-1} |
345 | 346 | $$ |
346 | 347 |
|
347 | | -This is Weisskopf modified to include a hinderance factor $O_{Pd}$ which we estimate to be 0.01. For $\epsilon \approx 6MeV$ and $A\approx 106$ we have |
| 348 | +This is Weisskopf modified to include a hinderance factor $O_{Pd}$ which we estimate to be 0.01. For $\epsilon \approx 6 \, \rm MeV$ and $A\approx 106$ we have |
348 | 349 |
|
349 | 350 | $$ |
350 | 351 | \Gamma_{M2} \sim 3.8 \times 10^8 \, \rm s^{-1} |
|
374 | 375 | \Gamma_{D_2/(3+1)/^4He \,incoherent} \sim \frac{(5.3\times 10^6)^2}{1.5\times 10^9} \approx 18,700 \, \rm s^{-1} |
375 | 376 | $$ |
376 | 377 | Note that if we don't use the large $g$ approximation and instead use the actual value for $F(g)$ for these parameters then we end up with a rate more like $2,800 \, \rm s^{-1}$. |
| 378 | + |
| 379 | +## 3+1 vs other products |
| 380 | + |
| 381 | +If we successfully transfer excitation from The $\rm D_2$ donors to $\rm Pd$ receivers, then the resulting products very sensitively on the composition of the lattice. For transfer to four $\rm Pd$ transitions, we have $\sim 6 \rm \, MeV$ of nuclear energy to dissipate. If this does not go into excess heat then it can go into gamma rays or an alpha particle if there are sufficient number of low Z impurities that can eject alphas preferentially to gammas. |
| 382 | + |
| 383 | +Because the excitation transfer pathway involves the compact (3+1) state which can decay to produce the standard fusion products. We estimated the rate of (3+1) products compared to other products in the SI according to |
| 384 | +$$ |
| 385 | +\frac{\Gamma_{3+1}}{\Gamma_{transfer}} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\Gamma_{transfer}\gamma_{tunnel}}{\sqrt{\mathcal{V}^2_{3+1/^4He}/h^2 + \gamma_{tunnel}^2}} |
| 386 | +\label{eq:3+1vsothers} |
| 387 | +$$ |
| 388 | +Where $h\gamma_{tunnel}\approx 5.95 \, \rm MeV$ is the linewidth (corresponding to $\gamma_{tunnel}\approx 1.4 \times 10^{21} \, \rm s^{-1}$) of the tunnel decay from the (3+1) state into the standard fusion products and $\mathcal{V}_{3+1/^4He}$ it the Dicke enhanced matrix element between the (3+1) state and the $\rm ^4He$ ground state |
| 389 | +$$ |
| 390 | +\mathcal{V}_{3+1/^4He} = |\langle \rm ^4He | a_z | {\rm 3+1} \rangle| c \sqrt{\langle P_{\rm ^4He}^2 \rangle}\sqrt{N_{\rm ^4He}} |
| 391 | +$$ |
| 392 | +We can rewrite this in terms of dissipated power as we did in Eq. $\ref{eq:g_to_Pdiss}$ |
| 393 | +$$ |
| 394 | +\mathcal{V}_{3+1/^4He} = |\langle \rm ^4He | a_z | {\rm 3+1} \rangle| \sqrt{M_{^4He}c^2 P_{diss} \tau_A} \, \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mathrm{^4He}}}{N}} |
| 395 | +$$ |
| 396 | +Where $ |\langle \rm ^4He | a_z | {\rm 3+1} \rangle| \approx 0.000315$. |
| 397 | + |
| 398 | + |
| 399 | + |
| 400 | +Given that |
| 401 | +$$ |
| 402 | +\sqrt{\tau_A} = 10^{-6}\left( \frac{1\,\mathrm{MHz}}{f_A} \right)^{3/4} 10^{-7\times -3/4} \approx 0.178\left( \frac{1\,\mathrm{MHz}}{f_A} \right)^{3/4} |
| 403 | +$$ |
| 404 | +and |
| 405 | +$$ |
| 406 | +\sqrt{M_{^4He}c^2} = \sqrt{4 \times 1.67\times 10^{-27} \times (3\times 10^8)^2} \approx \sqrt{6\times 10^{-10}} \approx 2.45 \times 10^{-5} |
| 407 | +$$ |
| 408 | +then |
| 409 | +$$ |
| 410 | +\mathcal{V}_{3+1/^4He} = 1.37\times 10^{-9} \left( \frac{1\,\mathrm{MHz}}{f_A} \right)^{3/4} \sqrt{ \frac{P_{diss}}{1\,\mathrm{W}} } \, \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mathrm{^4He}}}{N}} \, \rm J |
| 411 | +$$ |
| 412 | +And |
| 413 | +$$ |
| 414 | +\frac{\mathcal{V}_{3+1/^4He}}{h} \approx 2 \times 10^{24} \left( \frac{1\,\mathrm{MHz}}{f_A} \right)^{3/4} \sqrt{ \frac{P_{diss}}{1\,\mathrm{W}} } \, \sqrt{\frac{N_{\mathrm{^4He}}}{N}} \, \rm s^{-1} |
| 415 | +$$ |
| 416 | +In the limit that $\mathcal{V}_{3+1/^4He} \gg \gamma_{tunnel}$ then using indirect transfer rate we have |
| 417 | +$$ |
| 418 | +\frac{\Gamma_{3+1}}{\Gamma_{transfer}} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{\Gamma_{transfer}\gamma_{tunnel}}{\mathcal{V}^2_{3+1/^4He}/h^2} = \frac{1}{2}\frac{245 \sqrt{\frac{N_{D_2}}{N}} \sqrt{N_{^4 He}} F(g)^4 \rho \,\delta \epsilon \times 1.4\times 10^{21}}{4 \times 10^{48} \left( \frac{1\,\mathrm{MHz}}{f_A} \right)^{3/4} \sqrt{ \frac{P_{diss}}{1\,\mathrm{W}} } \, \frac{N_{\mathrm{^4He}}}{N} } |
| 419 | +$$ |
| 420 | + |
| 421 | +$$ |
| 422 | +\approx 8.6\times 10^{-26} \rho \,\delta \epsilon\sqrt{N_{D_2}}\sqrt{\frac{N}{N_{\mathrm{^4He}}}}\left( \frac{f_A}{1\,\mathrm{MHz}} \right)^{3/4} \sqrt{ \frac{1\,\mathrm{W}}{P_{diss}} }F(g)^4 |
| 423 | +$$ |
| 424 | + |
| 425 | +For SI parameters we have |
| 426 | +$$ |
| 427 | +\frac{\Gamma_{3+1}}{\Gamma_{transfer}} \sim 0.02 F(g)^4 |
| 428 | +$$ |
| 429 | +Where I multipled and divided by $\sqrt{N}$ and then using $N\sim 10^{18}$ and assumed $N_{\mathrm{^4He}} \sim 1$. |
0 commit comments