-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 366
SingleBockProviderFulu with soft and hard limit for sampled blocks #10533
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
gfukushima
wants to merge
13
commits into
Consensys:master
Choose a base branch
from
gfukushima:single-block-provider-fulu
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
13 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
811317a
single-block-provider-fulu with soft and hard limit for sampled blocks
gfukushima cf749fe
spotless
gfukushima 6295275
Merge branch 'master' into single-block-provider-fulu
gfukushima 9d7c3c6
cursor review
gfukushima 914d7bd
Merge branch 'master' into single-block-provider-fulu
gfukushima d8f21bf
add flag to modify default number of blocks to be sampled
gfukushima bad9e31
spotless
gfukushima ca49195
change config to minimum of 128 sampled blocks as this is what curren…
gfukushima 5daa841
spotless
gfukushima bbde4b2
Merge branch 'master' into single-block-provider-fulu
gfukushima 39304b1
added sampler back to recent block fetcher service
gfukushima 0becf16
fix constructor in test class
gfukushima ba1926a
comments
gfukushima File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Shouldn't we put
containsBlockin BlockEventsListener interface and check it both for dataColumnSidecars and blobSidecars in router? Maybe add an extra interface for clarity or rename this one but it looks like we are doing the same job here, isn't it?