Open
Conversation
15dc51a to
351fb32
Compare
Member
Author
|
[actually there is a bug in my implementation - let me revisit how we bind projections first] |
Member
Author
|
went into a quick rabbit hole and started to re-do our entire projection infrastructure. will hold this until that is ready! |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Sometimes we might want to have slightly more type-safe projection classes that are based on some minor transformation from the actual column types. Examples might include:
While this could be accomplished by a two-step approach (i.e. have the projection match the exact database column types and then have a second data class and the appropriate wrappers), for some use cases that is cumbersome and unnecessarily boilerplate-y.
This adds a
YawnProjection.mappingfunction that performs an in-memory post-processing to a projection value. This does not change the SQL query, but just uses Yawn strong type system to apply the transformation in-memory before building the resulting object.