Skip to content

Directus: Unauthenticated Denial of Service via GraphQL Alias Amplification of Expensive Health Check Resolver

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Apr 2, 2026 in directus/directus • Updated Apr 4, 2026

Package

npm directus (npm)

Affected versions

< 11.17.0

Patched versions

11.17.0

Description

Summary

The GraphQL specification permits a single query to repeat the same field multiple times using aliases, with each alias resolved independently by default. Directus did not deduplicate resolver invocations within a single request, meaning each alias triggered a full, independent execution of the underlying resolver.

The health check resolver ran all backend checks (database connectivity, cache, storage writes, and SMTP verification) on every invocation. Combined with unauthenticated access to the system GraphQL endpoint, this allowed an attacker to amplify resource consumption significantly from a single HTTP request, exhausting the database connection pool, storage I/O, and SMTP connections.

Fix

A request-scoped resolver deduplication mechanism was introduced and applied broadly across all GraphQL read resolvers, both system and items endpoints. When multiple aliases in a single request invoke the same resolver with identical arguments, only the first call executes; all subsequent aliases share its result. This eliminates the amplification factor regardless of how many aliases an attacker includes in a query.

Impact

  • Service degradation or outage: Database connection pool exhaustion prevents all Directus operations for all users
  • Storage I/O saturation: Concurrent file writes can overwhelm disk I/O
  • SMTP resource exhaustion: Concurrent SMTP verification calls may overwhelm the mail server
  • No authentication required: Any network-accessible attacker can trigger this condition
  • Single-request impact: A single request is sufficient to cause significant resource consumption

Credit

This vulnerability was discovered and reported by bugbunny.ai.

References

@br41nslug br41nslug published to directus/directus Apr 2, 2026
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Apr 4, 2026
Reviewed Apr 4, 2026
Last updated Apr 4, 2026

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
Low
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

EPSS score

Weaknesses

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption

The product does not properly control the allocation and maintenance of a limited resource. Learn more on MITRE.

Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling

The product allocates a reusable resource or group of resources on behalf of an actor without imposing any intended restrictions on the size or number of resources that can be allocated. Learn more on MITRE.

CVE ID

No known CVE

GHSA ID

GHSA-6q22-g298-grjh

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.