Skip to content

fix: update not applying zero value checks#222

Merged
jmattheis merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix-default-update-non-pointer
Mar 4, 2026
Merged

fix: update not applying zero value checks#222
jmattheis merged 2 commits intomainfrom
fix-default-update-non-pointer

Conversation

@jmattheis
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Fixes #221

@jmattheis jmattheis force-pushed the fix-default-update-non-pointer branch from 3aa6f24 to 279ca7c Compare March 4, 2026 17:48
@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Mar 4, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 95.95%. Comparing base (e5e4ffd) to head (f64844e).
⚠️ Report is 3 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #222   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.95%   95.95%           
=======================================
  Files          50       50           
  Lines        2743     2743           
=======================================
  Hits         2632     2632           
  Misses         80       80           
  Partials       31       31           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@jmattheis jmattheis force-pushed the fix-default-update-non-pointer branch from 279ca7c to 2ac5d69 Compare March 4, 2026 18:33
@jmattheis jmattheis force-pushed the fix-default-update-non-pointer branch from 63c9592 to f64844e Compare March 4, 2026 18:36
@jmattheis jmattheis merged commit a7d0f0f into main Mar 4, 2026
14 checks passed
@jmattheis jmattheis deleted the fix-default-update-non-pointer branch March 4, 2026 18:42
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Inconsistent behavior between structs and pointers when update default

1 participant