attempt to revise paragraph indicated as needing revision#2
Open
kaduk wants to merge 1 commit intomskucherawy:masterfrom
Open
attempt to revise paragraph indicated as needing revision#2kaduk wants to merge 1 commit intomskucherawy:masterfrom
kaduk wants to merge 1 commit intomskucherawy:masterfrom
Conversation
kaduk
commented
Nov 3, 2020
| For XML submissions, text, PDF, and HTML versions will be autogenerated from | ||
| the XML version. PostScript and/or PDF versions can be submitted alongside | ||
| plain text version, but are not accepted without an authoritative plain text | ||
| version (even if figures must be omitted). PostScript and PDF should be |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Submission is currently closed, so I couldn't verify that we still take these other formats.
| to achieve bolding or underlining is not acceptable. | ||
|
|
||
| For XML submissions, text, PDF, and HTML versions will be autogenerated from | ||
| the XML version. PostScript and/or PDF versions can be submitted alongside |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The new wording implies that we discard any PDF/etc. included with an XML upload, which I am not entirely confident is currently true.
| [MSK: This paragraph and the next probably need revision.] | ||
| [BJK: Yes!] | ||
|
|
||
| I-Ds are generally in the format of an RFC, although they may be rough drafts |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
"format" here was overloaded for both the plain-text bit and the layout; I dropped it down to just being the layout/structure since the format of an RFC is now multi-valued.
| I-Ds are generally written with a structure similar to that of an RFC, | ||
| although they may be rough drafts when the first version is submitted. This | ||
| structure is specified fully in "Instructions to RFC Authors" (on the RFC | ||
| Editor's Web pages [RFCED]). With the advent of the "v3" RFC-authoring |
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Assuming those instructions are supposed to be https://www.rfc-editor.org/old/instructions2authors.txt they are kind of dated.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Take a fairly conservative stance and preserve the bits about postscript/PDF submissions, while trying to encourage XML.