Skip to content

Implement TestInterceptorNackReply#2986

Open
jech wants to merge 2 commits intopion:mainfrom
jech:nack-test-2
Open

Implement TestInterceptorNackReply#2986
jech wants to merge 2 commits intopion:mainfrom
jech:nack-test-2

Conversation

@jech
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

@jech jech commented Jan 2, 2025

Another end-to-end test, this time for the NACK responder.
It verifies that we actually receive a reply to a NACK,
both when we negotiate an RTX track and when we don't.

This currently fails, for unknown reasons.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov bot commented Jan 2, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 63.50%. Comparing base (1ee0299) to head (fb1c61f).
⚠️ Report is 297 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (1ee0299) and HEAD (fb1c61f). Click for more details.

HEAD has 2 uploads less than BASE
Flag BASE (1ee0299) HEAD (fb1c61f)
go 2 0
Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2986       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   77.93%   63.50%   -14.43%     
===========================================
  Files          89       67       -22     
  Lines       10546     3957     -6589     
===========================================
- Hits         8219     2513     -5706     
+ Misses       1838     1316      -522     
+ Partials      489      128      -361     
Flag Coverage Δ
go ?
wasm 63.50% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jech jech force-pushed the nack-test-2 branch 3 times, most recently from fc9d59e to 7bfc4bf Compare January 2, 2025 18:20
jech added 2 commits January 3, 2025 02:02
One variable was misnamed, and we never checked for the end
of the RTCP loop.
This is another end-to-end test for the NACK interceptor,
it verifies that we actually get a reply to a NACK, both with
and without a negotiated RTX track.
@Sean-Der Sean-Der added this to the V4.1.0 milestone Feb 13, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants